Paris

I know I owe the blog a post on the city of Bourges, and I promise I’ll get to it, as Bourges was quite an interesting place. But…we’re in Paris for a couple days and I think I’ll throw a Paris post in for the heck of it. This will be just kind of freeform, mostly pictures.

Quiet Streets

For some reason, the walk today took us on a number of quiet streets. Paris is a big city and like all big cities, noisy. But these streets are all in popular parts of Paris, they all connect main streets and yet, well, look at the pictures.

Some stores we liked:

Seine Walks

I’ve talked before about how Paris has opened up the Seine river banks to pedestrians. Here’s some pictures of another area. This one is almost a mile long.

Rodin’s Garden

We ended by having lunch at the cafeteria in Rodin’s garden. It’s not the greatest food, but the setting: in a beautiful garden with Rodin sculptures around. Fabulous.

Palais Garnier

Palais Garnier is the smaller of Paris’s two opera houses and definitely the over-the-top one. It was built on the commission of Napoleon III, who was Emperor of France (taking after his uncle) from 1852 to 1870. Napoleon III was a lousy emperor, but a great city-builder; Paris today is largely the result of his efforts, as carried out by Baron Von Haussmann and others. Charles Garnier got the commission to develop this opera house. Although an architectural upstart at the time, this building made his reputation and career.

Palais Garnier, also known as Opéra Garnier.

Palais Garnier, also known as Opéra Garnier.


The top of these bannisters is onxy! Onyx is so rare and expensive it's usually used for small pieces of jewelry. Garnier spent, well, a lot of money on onyx, which came from Algeria.

The top of these bannisters is onxy! Onyx is so rare and expensive it’s usually used for small pieces of jewelry. Garnier spent, well, a lot of money on this onyx, which came from Algeria.

The ceiling painted by Marc Chagall in 1964; it contains scenes from operas and ballets. It was not exactly popular - this modern art in a classic setting - but most people now accept it as a masterpiece. Laurie and I agree.

The ceiling painted by Marc Chagall in 1964; it contains scenes from operas and ballets. It was not exactly popular – this modern art in a classic setting – but most people now accept it as a masterpiece. Laurie and I agree.

Yep, that's gold all over the place.

Yep, that’s gold all over the place.

The Ballroom. Can you say, "Over the top?"

The Ballroom. Can you say, “Over the top?”

Laurie checking out the sights from the balcony.

Laurie checking out the sights from the balcony.

We took a guided tour of Palais Garnier and are soooooo glad we did. Definitely a high point of Paris for us.

Posted in Paris | 1 Comment

Ramble II – Sancerre

Next, we drove to the town of Sancerre. I doubt anyone knows of Sancerre unless they like French white wine. The region around Sancerre produces a beautiful white wine. One small part of the city proper is a bit touristy, with lots of places to try and buy the wines of Sancerre. Other parts are quiet and beautiful:

We had lunch in the tiny town of Cauvignol, famous for its chevre – goat cheese. There, we had a very nice bottle of Sancerre wine, so we went to the winery. For those who have been to wineries in, say, Napa Valley, this was a bit different. We found the winery, rang a bell on the door, and after five minutes or so, a woman came out of a house down the street. She took us into the room where the wines were bottled and stored, and poured us a couple tastes. We liked best the wine we had at lunch, so we bought a bunch of it.

How are we going to get all this in the car?!?

How are we going to get all this in the car?!?


We did not buy that much; Laurie and I bought six bottles, Mary and Gilles twelve, I think.

What a difference from a Napa Valley experience: no tasting fee, no fancy tasting room, no shirts/ball caps/books/posters/scarfs/glasses/whatever. Just “Here’s our wine. Buy some if you like it.” The wine we bought cost $11.45 per bottle. I looked it up on the ‘net because the winery woman told us they export some to the United States. Sure enough, I found it: $24 per bottle plus tax plus shipping, a total of somewhere around $30 per bottle. No wonder we don’t see much of it in the US of A.

One last comment. I love this about France: you’re driving out in the middle of nowhere and come upon something like this:

A 15th century fortress/chateau/farm.

A 15th century fortress/chateau/farm.


Then, on our way to Bourges.

Posted in Rambles | Comments Off on Ramble II – Sancerre

Ramble II – Pont du Canal

Both readers of this blog know that Laurie and I are fascinated by the canals of France. Honestly, we can’t say why but we like to walk along them and we like to watch boats go through the locks. Most of the canals in France are no longer used for commercial boats; the Canal du Loing, which is near our French home of Montigny-sur-Loing, sees maybe two or three commercial boats a day, and we’re not sure why there are that many. The canals now are almost exclusively for pleasure boats.

Anyway, today we saw an interesting canal sight: a canal bridge that crosses the Loire River: water crossing water. Pont du Canal (“Canal Bridge”) was built in the 1880’s; it was designed by Gustave Eiffel – he of the…well, you know.

We walked across the bridge, of course. The bridge was built for commercial traffic; there weren’t any pleasure boats on French Canals in the 1880’s. The bridge connected a canal network on the north side of the Loire with a canal network on the south side. Before the bridge, boats had to lock from one canal system into the Loire – which could be very fast and hard to navigate at times – and then lock into the other canal system on the opposite side. We saw those two locks, also, but as they haven’t been used since 1889, I think maybe no one really wants to see pictures of them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ramble II – Bailley and Briare

We’re off on another ramble! Our first stop is in Bailley, where we’ll visit the caves of the local wine cooperative. This winery is known for sparkling wines – we’d call them champagnes except that a wine cannot be called a champagne unless it comes from the champagne region. The wines made here are made with the same type grape using the same process as champagne, but “champagne” they aren’t and “sparkling wines” they are.

After the tour – not exactly exciting – we tried a couple of the wines. One was a regular white sparkling wine, the other a rosé. Now, I have to say, we are not fans of “pink champagne,” so we were wondering about that rosé, but I can tell you that rosé sparkling wines are a long, long way from the pink champagne swill of years past. This rosé sparkling wine is really good – crisp and dry and just a touch of rosé; we split a case with Mary & Gilles (note: in France, a case is six bottles, not twelve). Cost: about $11 per bottle.

Then it was off for a first look at the most unusual and most historical canal lock in France. Now, both regular readers of this blog will recall that Laurie and I really enjoy walking along the canals of France and seeing the locks in action, so we were looking forward to this one: a set of seven locks that go up a hill, constructed in the early 17th century and used for over 250 years. They are not, of course, used today, and the lock mechanisms are gone, but the lock structures are still there.

Here’s what the Sept Écluses look like today:

From the bottom...

From the bottom…

From the top. You can see the canal in use today.

From the top. You can see the canal in use today.


When the Sept Écluses were replaced by a wider canal, there were 3,000 to 4,000 boats using these locks annually. I suspect each passage up or down the locks took about three hours.

Next day (okay, I’m jumping ahead here), we returned and walked along the canal – unused since 1889).

Laurie, Mary and Gilles on the walk along the 17th century canal.

Laurie, Mary and Gilles on the walk along the 17th century canal.

The canal at the top of the locks. It's had 130 years to get overgrown with trees.

The canal at the top of the locks. It’s had 130 years to get overgrown with trees.


That really was it for the first day. So we went to our place for the next two nights: a B & B. Now a few words about B & B’s…

Our experience with B & Bs has not been all that great, and this one kind of fit in with that experience. It seems that French B & Bs often want to give guests a room with Old French Charm (OFC). Unfortunately, OFC requires money, because OFC requires antiques, and money for decorating is one thing B & B owners seem to lack. So the rooms get decorated with Old French Junk (OFJ). This B & B – on a beautiful estate, with a beautiful garden and beautiful main house – was furnished in a style best described as … um…er…well, I don’t know what; OFJ, I guess. Pictures:

The "chandelier"

The “chandelier”

 

Note the can of bug spray on the night-stand: always the sign of a high-class establishment. None of the furniture matched, none was of high- or even medium-quality, and most of it appeared to come from a garage sale. We even had a decanter and glass set that had a sign on it "For decoration only."

Note the can of bug spray on the night-stand: always the sign of a high-class establishment. None of the furniture matched, none was of high- or even medium-quality, and most of it appeared to come from a garage sale. We even had a decanter and glass set that had a sign on it “For decoration only.”

Fortunately, traveling with Mary & Gilles avoids the other complaint I have about B & Bs: making new friends at breakfast. The four of us can sit and talk about the day’s plans or yesterday’s activities or whatever – we have never run out of conversation topics. So I don’t have to sit down and make nice with total strangers. I am definitely a morning anti-social guy, so talking with a bunch of people I don’t know and will never see again is not my cup o’ tea!

Posted in Rambles | 1 Comment

Ramble II

Last Wednesday we left, with Mary and Gilles, on a ramble toward the south. We really didn’t go too far – our return trip, which was from the farthest point south, took less than two hours to get back to Montigny. But we did lots of enjoyable things and saw many interesting sights. Over the next couple days, I’ll do some posts about this ramble.

Our itinerary:
Wednesday – drove to Briare. Along the way we stopped for an excellent lunch in Irancy, visited a winery, then drove to see an amazing sight for us canal-and-lock lovers: a set of seven locks, all on one unit, that mount a hill in Rogny, which is now know as Rogny-les-Sept-Écluses (Rogny of the Seven Locks). One interesting fact about these locks: construction started in 1605, was completed in 1629, and they were in use for 290 years!

Thursday – went back to Rogny-les-Sept-Êcluses for a walk along the old canal, then to see a famous bridge. The bridge – called the Pont du Canal carries a canal across the Loire River. We did some more searching for a couple old canal locks that we wanted to see, and finished with an excellent dinner in Gien.

Friday – off to wine country! First stop was that small town of Sancerre, in the region that produces the excellent Sancerre white wine. Lunch in a tiny village, a stop at a winery that produces the wine we had at lunch, then off to the city of Bourges.

Saturday – toured Bourges, a fascinating city, with a spectacular gothic cathedral and the private residence of Jacque Couer a 15th century merchant who almost controlled France. Wrapped up with a wonderful dinner.

Sunday – a quick look at a most unusual lock, then another canal bridge across another river and, as the rain started,a drive home.

I’ll try to minimize the wordage about canals and locks; we find them infinitely interesting, but I doubt anyone else does. I’ll try to do a post for each day, probably taking a day for each post, so over the next four or five days I’ll have filled you in on the entire ramble.

First up will be a winery visit and Rogny-les-Sept-Écluses.

Posted in Rambles | Leave a comment

Nothing Happening

We’ve just been hanging around, resting up and getting ready for our next ramble. Wednesday, we head south a bit with Mary and Gilles. We’ll spend a couple days in Briare and a couple days in Bourges. We will also visit Sancerre, home of a great white wine. Not that we will indulge in any, of course…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Paris IV

Tuesday Laurie and I headed north to Paris for a few days. Our nephew Brian and his wife Jennifer (I guess that makes her our “niece-in-law;” is there such a word?) arrived in Paris that day for their first visit and we were really looking forward to seeing them and doing some Paris stuff with them. We ended up staying until Saturday and we had a great time, when we did stuff with Brian and Jenn and when we did some stuff on our own.

The first day we just did a walk around the two islands of Paris – Ile de la Cité and Ile St. Louis. I was able to bore them by telling stories about lots of stuff. But, hey, I did it for a reason: they had flown from Seattle and were a little jet-lagged, and they were able to catch a number of cat-naps while I told my stories.

Anyway, next day we went to Musée Pompidou with its amazing collection of modern art. Now, I have to say that I am not a connoisseur of modern art, so I wasn’t too sure about this expedition. But several friends had recommended that we visit the Pompidou, and I’m glad we did. There is a Roy Lichtenstein exposition there, and that was fabulous. The rest of the museum has works I liked and works I could only respond to with “Huh?”

We did some other fun stuff.

The next day we took a walk of Montmartre – probably the most well-known area of Paris. We took a walk (from the excellent book, “Walking Paris : Thirty Original Walks In and Around Paris,” by Gilles Desmons) that started at the back side of Montmartre and wandered around the most interesting areas. The street below is Villa Leandre, a row of private houses; I cannot imagine what these houses are worth, in this city of apartments.
Villa Leandre
And we were not the only ones enjoying a beautiful day.
Montmartre

But of course, the walk eventually had to go into the areas best known by the tourists, just because…because…ummmm…well, I don’t know why. We saw lots of beautiful areas on the walk and then…

The line to get into Sacre Cour's decidedly un-interesting interior.

The line to get into Sacre Cour’s decidedly un-interesting interior.

Place Tertre - ugh

Place Tertre – ugh

(Start of rant.)

I don’t understand this at all. Place Tertre and the small area around it are not unlike Disneyland: everything is phony and gussied-up and quaint and meant to accomplish one thing: extract money from tourists. And the tourists come in hordes. I can name twenty neighborhoods in Paris that are more authentic and interesting than this part of Montmartre, but no one goes to them. Maybe it’s a good thing that all these tourists are here and not ruining other neighborhoods. But I can’t imagine why anyone would see this and think they’d seen Paris.

(End of rant.)

After our tour, we went a few blocks away from the scene above and introduced Brian and Jenn to a favorite Paris tradition: lunch at a sidewalk café. We had a wonderful meal, the weather was perfect and, well, you can see…

Wonderful salads, wine, raspberry tarte and chocolate for dessert. Hard to beat that.

Wonderful salads, wine, raspberry tarte and chocolate for dessert. Hard to beat that.


Further proof of my good friend Ken Disbrow’s observation that the well-traveled path isn’t very wide. We were no more that a ten-minute walk from the place where the picture above was taken. The restaurant clientele was French people, and us.

In an earlier post I commented on how Paris has opened up a long stretch of Seine riverfront, but I didn’t have any good pictures. Laurie and I walked this again a couple days ago and I got some better pictures. We love walking along the Seine, have always wished there were more places to do that, and so are very glad this has opened. We hear that plans are underway to open up more areas.

St. Denis

Friday Laurie and I went to the Basilica of St. Denis, a twenty-minute metro ride north of Paris’ center. St. Denis is famous for two reasons: it is the first Gothic cathedral built; and all the French monarchs (and most of their queens) were buried here and darn near every one of them had an effigy carved for their tomb. So St. Denis is a lesson in architecture and a lesson in art history, as we see the effigies change from medieval rigidity to Renaissance beauty. (The kings and queens themselves are gone, thrown into a common grave during the French Revolution.)

In her fabulous book, “Paris to the Past,” Ina Caro writes about the revolution in architecture wrought by Abbot Suger, who built St. Denis in the mid-12th century. Before, the bishops and archbishops of France built and worshipped in Romanesque churches. Romanesque architecture is plain and low and powerful (and has its own beauty – Laurie and I love Romanesque and have made some long detours to see Romanesque buildings). Suger and his architects learned how to do away with the massive walls required by large Romanesque churches and replace them with weight-bearing ribs. That meant the space between the ribs could be anything, and Abbot Suget loved stained glass. So Suger put stained glass windows into his church, the first time that had been done.

Ina Caro describes the inauguration of St. Denis. Abbot Suger invited all the church higher-ups in France, they all arrived and, on the day of the inauguration, he escorted them into the Church. Remember, all these church authorities were from dioceses with low and squat and powerful Romanesque churches; here’s what they would have seen when Abbot Suger opened the doors to them:
St. Denis
Caro points out that immediately after the inauguration, many churches around France had “accidental” fires, and were replaced by Gothic churches; the first replacements were built by the same architects and craftsmen that Suger used and Gothic architecture ruled for several hundred years. For example, Notre Dame, in Paris, had been started earlier as a Romanesque church; work was stopped and it was redesigned Gothic.

Anyway, seeing St. Denis was worth the trip out. I won’t say much about the effigies because, while they were interesting to a history nut like me (“Oh, look, there’s Francois 1st’s tomb! And there’s Henry IV’s! Oh, boy!”), I’m not sure it’s of interest to either of my faithful readers.

Friday night we went to dinner with Brian and Jenn, as the next day they were heading off to Berlin to see the Zumsteg contingent there (they’ll have a couple days in Paris before they return to Seattle), and we saw this at sunset:
Paris

After dinner, which was eminently forgettable except for a delightful waiter, we walked around the islands. So, one last Paris picture: Brian and Jenn.
Brian and Jenn

We really, really enjoyed having Brian and Jenn here and wished it could have been longer. We think they may have caught the travel bug and the Paris bug, so they’ll be back. Paris will still be here; we hope we are, too!

Posted in Paris | 3 Comments

Fontainebleau

We’ve had lots of folks who wanted to come and stay with us, and it has pained us that we just don’t have enough room for everyone here in Montigny-sur-Loing. So we decided to look for a place we could rent that has a little more space, a few more bedrooms. Today we found the ideal rental, nearby in the town of Fontainebleau, and with lots of room for everybody:
Fontainebleau
It even has a couple extra wings, in case more people arrive, and a nice area for swimming on those hot days:
Fontainebleau

Fontainebleau Chateau

The building you’re seeing is, of course, the Chateau of Fontainebleau. Although not as sumptuous as Versailles, it has a much more interesting history. Versailles was built by one person, King Louis XIV, during his 72-year reign from 1643 to 1715, so while it’s over-the-top on ostentatious displays of wealth and power, it reflects only Louis XIV’s ideas on art and architecture. Fontainebleau was built, changed and added-on to by many kings (and an Emperor) and so has a wider variety of styles and art. Having said that, much of it is over-the-top, too!

The oldest part of the chateau was built in the late 1100’s by Louis VII (king from 1137-1180); it had a chapel consecrated by Thomas à Becket. Philip-Augustus (1180-1223) and Louis IX (1226-1270) made it their home chateau and lived there. But it was Francois I (1515-1547) who added much of what we see today. His son, Henry II (1547-1559) and his queen, Catherine de Medici, also added to the chateau and carried out extensive modifications. The chateau sits in almost 200 acres of formal gardens, and is in the center of the Fontainebleau forest, which was once a private hunting preserve for the monarchy, and contains 110 square miles(!).

Enough historic blather; here are some pictures of the Chateau:

And pictures of the interior:

We took the audio tour of the chateau. We skipped a couple parts of it and still spent two-and-a-half hours walking through one spectacular room after another. In that 2-1/2 hours, we saw maybe 1% of the rooms in the chateau!

Posted in Around Us | Leave a comment

Laurie’s Excellent Train Adventure

Just when we think we’ve got it all figured out here…

Yesterday Laurie took the train to visit Mary for the afternoon. Now, trains here run right on schedule; we know that the trains from Paris stop at Bois-le-Roi (the stop for Mary & Gilles) and leave there at exactly 51 minutes past the hour, arriving in Montigny (our town’s stop) twenty-six minutes later. Every hour from 5:51 a.m. to 11:51 p.m. Except…

After a fine afternoon together, Laurie and Mary, knowing that the train leaves Bois-le-Roi at exactly 51 minutes after the hour, get to the Bois-le-Roi station a few minutes before 5:51. Sure enough, at 5:50, a train rolls in, stops for about a minute, and starts off, now with Laurie on it. It makes a stop at Fontainebleau, then at Moret, then at Saint-Mammès.

At this point, Laurie is thinking, “Saint-Mammès? We’ve never stopped at Saint-Mammès before,” and she sees the Seine River along side the tracks, which she has ever before seen on the Bois-le-Roi to Montigny trip. Panic builds. The next stop is Montereau, where everybody gets off, as the train has reached its final stop. Laurie gets off, too, finds a railroad employee and asks just how in the heck did she get to Montereau when she wanted to get to Montigny and just how in the heck is she going to actually get to Montigny? The employee, recognizing panic when he sees it, takes Laurie into an air-conditioned office with a bunch of SNCF workers, where they get Laurie’s cellphone out and call Mary – our landline number here wasn’t in the phone, Laurie couldn’t remember it and, as you’ll see in a minute, it wouldn’t have helped if she could. They do find Mary’s cellphone number and call it. Mary answers and Laurie tells her she’s in Montereau, because the train never stopped in Montigny. (In fact, the train never went through Montigny.)

So Mary calls me on our landline. I see that it’s Mary so I answer, but I can’t hear a thing. She calls again, with the same result. Our landline handset has decided that this would be a good time to act up. Mary then sends me an email asking me to call her. Fortunately, I was on the laptop, so I got it immediately, told her the phone was on the fritz and asked what was up. “Laurie’s in Montereau, that’s what’s up.” Could I go get her?

So I drove to Montereau – about twenty minutes away – and parked at the gare. No Laurie. I looked around, started toward the platforms, and here comes Laurie, with one of her rescuing SNCF workers. We thanked him, got in the car, came home and had some wine. Had copieuse wine, in fact.

Turns out that the trains southbound to Montigny leave Bois-le-Roi at fifty-one minutes past every hour except the 4, 5 and 6 o’clock in the afternoon trains. For those three hours the Montigny trains leave at 41 minutes past the hour, and there is conveniently a different train at 51 minutes after the hour that splits off to a different route after a couple stops and ends up in Montereau. But Laurie and Mary and Gilles didn’t know about the different departure time and so when the fifty-one-minute-after-the-hour-train arrived in Bois-le-Roi, Laurie figured it was the regular Montigny train and climbed aboard. Simple, eh? Except, of course, it wasn’t the train to Montigny; it was the train to Montereau. Laurie wants me to note that the trains are not marked with their route anywhere; you just have to know what train goes where.

Laurie was so thankful for the help that she gave her SNCF friends a jar of home-made apricot jam made by Mary that morning that she was bringing home. I’m sure they enjoyed that treat as much as Laurie enjoyed her wine when we got home.

Just another adventure…

Posted in Montigny | 1 Comment

Auray Craziness

If you travel around enough, you will surely encounter some things you just could not expect. The harbor of Auray gave us just that experience.

We drove to Auray when we left Carnac. Mary had told us that the old harbor of Auray is beautiful. Gilles pointed out that it also was historic, in that Benjamin Franklin landed here when he came to France in 1776, seeking France’s help in the United State’s Revolutionary War. So off to the small, sleepy harbor of Auray we went.

First hint that something was going on: the parking lots around the harbor area were full, on a Sunday afternoon. Second hint, as we walked down the hill to the harbor, we could hear yelling and cheering and what sounded like someone announcing a contest on a loudspeaker. Hmmmm, something was not as we expected.

We turned the corner to the harbor and saw that the area was jammed with people, all of whom were watching something in the water. We pushed to the fence and saw… well, let me show you some pictures.

First, a boat rowing out into the harbor. Note the guy with the long pole on the back. Note also that the team is dressed in Mexican garb, including sombreros, serapes and fake mustaches.
_MG_8465

Another boat, with another oddly-dressed team, was coming from the other direction. They rowed like crazy toward each other and we realized that it was a boat-joust – the guys with poles were going to try to knock each other into the water.

_MG_8468

Closer…

_MG_8469
Closer…

_MG_8470

Closer…

_MG_8471

Splash!

_MG_8472

Sure enough, the Mexicans won this joust, as the guy from the other team got knocked off his perch and into the water. This was all accompanied by frenzied shouting from spectators lining the waterfront.

I later saw a scoreboard – there were sixteen teams in this tournament! We do not have the slightest idea why this team was dressed in pseudo-Mexican costumes. I will say that if I were from Mexico, I’d have been offended!

Now, the other crazy thing is that about a minute after we turned that corner, I said to Laurie, “We’ve been here!” And we had been there. Nine years ago we spent some time with Laurie’s former boss at the library, Jeane, and her French husband, Bertrand. We all went to Carnac, and Bertrand took us to this very harbor afterwards. So, it was deja vue all over again, except that nine years ago the place was deserted and today it was jammed.

And, truth to tell, the Auray harbor isn’t all that interesting. It has been “gussied up” to attract the tourist trade and it is just so pretty and so quaint and so inauthentic. Give us a real town any day!

Posted in Rambles | Leave a comment