Driving a Classic

Most folks who know me know I love old cars and old airplanes; today I got up-close-and-personal with a classic French car, the Citroën 2CV. Last Saturday night we had a wonderful dinner; one couple there own a Citroën Deux-Chevaux and when I mentioned how much I enjoy 2CV’s Helen asked if I’d like to see hers and go for a ride. Well, of course I would!

DSC09258

Helen’s 2CV. It’s a 1978, beautifully maintained. Honestly, this car didn’t look so good the day it came out of the factory.

A little 2CV history: the “Deuche,” as it’s affectionately known, was thought up by the head of the Michelin Tyre Company in the 1930s and when Michelin bought the bankrupt Citroën Automobile Company, the car became a reality…almost. With great fanfare (and after over 250 different prototypes were built to test different designs), the car was announced in 1939. The next day, France declared war on Germany and World War II started. Production was, quite understandably, postponed.

The first real production 2CV rolled out of the factory in 1948. What does the “2CV” name mean: “deux-chevaux,” – two horsepower -, of course; the output of the 2CV’s two-cylinder engine. Now that two horsepower rating was by a different standard than American cars; by American standards, the engine produced a whopping 9 horsepower.

DSC09263

The 2Cv’s engine. In fact, the 2CV’s engine and transmission, all in a package about 18 inches long. By the time this car was built, output was up to 33 horsepower by American measurement standards.

The design philosophy was pure minimalist: the goal was to keep the car simple, light, easy to maintain, and cheap.

DSC09260

Simple: steering wheel check; gearshift, check; seats, check. Other options, nope. This car has nice checked seat-covers; the original 2CV had a canvas sling seat, like a beach chair.

DSC09261

Automatic door opener, 2CV-style. You turn the knob and the door opens. Simple. Always works.

DSC09268

After a good walk-around, we were off. DSC09287 DSC09283 DSC09275

I gotta tell you, this car is noisy. My old MGs were whisper-quiet compared. But geeze this was fun! I couldn’t stop grinning: we were in real piece of French automobile history.

Believe it or not, this car was an sales immediate success with the French. Within two years, there was a five-year waiting list to buy one. And also believe it or not, its success continued: the Deuche holds the record for longest-produced car. It was built in France from 1948 to 1987: 39 years! (It was built in Portugal for another two years, adding to its longevity record.)

Putting her life in my hands, Helen asked if I wanted to drive. Well, of course I wanted to drive. I’m not sure Laurie, riding in the back, was so sure about this, but off we went. Neck-snapping acceleration was not present, and as Helen pointed out, you have to plan your braking because brakes are not a strong point. I’ve driven trucks with lighter steering, and the driver does a lot of steering because the Deuche kind of wanders around the road a bit. But I loved it!

DSC09294

I fit, but barely. The seats are adjustable by unbolting them from the floor and bolting them back into the position you want.

DSC09295

Over the years I’ve taken many photos of 2Cv’s because – for whatever reason – I love them. They represent a France that doesn’t exist anymore, and they represent a style of car that isn’t built anymore. They are ungainly, quirky, funny-looking in this day of sleek cars, but they are honest, authentic automobiles – classics. If we were to move here, I’d have one in a minute!

Many thanks to Helen, here with Laurie, for sharing her ride with me. I’ll have a different perspective on every Deuche I see now.

Helen, the 2CV's proud owner, and Laurie, celebrating a successful drive (meaning we returned in one piece even though I drove).

Helen, the 2CV’s proud owner, and Laurie, celebrating a successful drive (meaning we returned in one piece even though I drove).

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

More Fancy Old Rooms

After Chateau Fontainebleau we continued our week with more fancy old rooms. We love looking at these insights into the life of the rich and famous from centuries ago – don’t know why, but we do.

Last Stay in Paris (sob, sniff, boo-hoo)

We will return to Paris for a day trip or two just before we leave, but this week was our last stay at Mary & Gilles’ apartment there. We almost chickened out, as we went to the train station in a torrential downpour, but we persevered and though it wasn’t warm and sunny, at least we didn’t get rained on too much.

Our first stop was at the Louvre, Wednesday evening. The Louvre stays open until 9:45 on Wednesday and Friday evenings, and that’s about the only time we’ll go; the place is just too crowded during the day (not that it was exactly empty at night!).

Recently the Louvre opened a new exhibit of decorative arts from the times of Louis XIV, Louis XV and Louis XVI, which covers the years from about 1670 to 1790. Decorative Arts encompass just about anything that had to do with decorating the places that people lived during those times. Of course, only the very rich could afford to decorate anything, so we end up with an insight into how the kings and queens and aristocracy lived. I think we can safely say they lived very nicely.

DSC09185

A drawing room from the last quarter of the 17th century. Not too shabby.

DSC09182

There is a huge collection of porcelain plates; this is Laurie’s favorite.

DSC09180

Looking for a gift for the person who has everything? How about a nice gold chest to store all those things?

There are about thirty such rooms, all with furniture and art from the correct times. But you know what we liked best: the snuff boxes.

I can hear you saying, “Oh, boy, they’ve eaten too much cheese. Snuff boxes?” In the late 1600s and 1700s there was a huge rage to collect snuff boxes, and the exhibit had a bunch of them. They are just beautiful! Here are a few… Keep in mind that the largest of these is maybe two inches wide, and then look at the decoration on that tiny surface.

DSC09192

DSC09194

DSC09196

The pictures on the top and front of this box are about an inch high and an inch and three-quarters wide. How did the artist get such detail into it?

DSC09197
Snuff boxes – who’d’ve thunk? I’d like to collect a few myself, but I can only imagine what one of these would cost, and I can guarantee that it would drastically deplete my already depleted retirement fund. (Update: I Googled “snuff boxes auction” and turned up a few nice snuff boxes with porcelain paintings, but nothing like these. Minimum bid is 5,000€ (about $5,500). Laurie says I can’t place a bid.

The picture I post every year:

DSC09206

Nobody goes to see the Mona Lisa; they go to take a picture of the Mona Lisa, or a selfie of them with the Mona Lisa behind them because they are way more important than the Mona Lisa.

(Start of rant)
I have to say I don’t get the selfie craze. It seems to me that lots of people are going to look at their pictures when they get back home and say, “There’s me in front of the Eiffel Tower; there’s me in front of the Mona Lisa; there’s me in front something – don’t know what; there’s me at a café; there’s me at dinner the first night; there’s me at breakfast the next day; there’s me on some bridge across the Seine, there’s me in front of something else – don’t know what…” ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

I know this is nothing new, but we saw thousands of people taking pictures of themselves in front of something actually interesting. Ugh. I know I’m old fashioned about this stuff (notice how many pictures on this blog have Laurie and/or me in them), but sheesh, that a person has a picture of something means they were there; is it necessary to prove it by including themselves?
(End of rant)

Maybe worse, though: I saw a woman in the Decorative Arts exhibit who walked into each room, stopped long enough to take a picture and then moved to the next room, where she repeated the process. She is going to get home and have hundreds of pictures of things she could have actually seen at the Louvre.

Musée Nissam de Camondo

Continuing our Old Rooms Week, we went to the Musée Nissim de Camondo the next day. This home was built in the early 1900s by Comte Moïse Camondo to house and display his best-in-the-world collection of late 1700s furnishings. He inherited a house in the rather fashionable Monceau district of Paris, tore it down completely, and then designed and built a huge, beautiful home very much as if it had been built at the end of the 18th century. He loved that time, and dedicated his life to building this remarkable collection. Here are two rooms (full disclosure: I swiped the first two pictures from the museum’s website; photographs were not allowed, though I snuck a couple in the kitchen).

Camondo-2-2 Camondo-1-2

We’re getting ready to do a kitchen remodel when we return, and we got some good ideas:

DSC09216

Now there’s a range! Four ovens and enough room to make pancakes for an army.

DSC09220

Sadly, things turned out poorly for Comte de Camondo. He was forty when he married a twenty-year old woman, who gave him a son, Nissim, and a daughter, Beatrice, and then ran off with her horse trainer. When his son was killed in World War I, Moïse pretty much retired from life. He died in 1935, giving the house and his collection to France, which has maintained it since. Maybe it’s good that he died before the war, because his daughter, son-in-law and two grandchildren disappeared into Auschwitz and died there.

We’ve wanted to visit the Musée Nissim de Camodo for quite a while and I’m glad we finally got it together to do so. If you have a couple hours in Paris that you’d like to do something low-key, I recommend this place. It’s an amazing look into a beautiful past.

One Last Church

There are a million churches in Paris it seems, and many are beautiful and all, we think, worth a look-see. The last thing we did was to peek into Eglise Saint Etienne du Mont, which is in the Latin Quarter. Now this church has some unusual features: the ancient tombstone of St. Genevieve, patronne saint of Paris; a bent nave (really, see the picture below), but what is most interesting is that it has the last and only jubé (“rood screen” in English) in Paris.

The jubé separates the parish congregation from the priests during a Mass. Why they needed to be separated I don’t know, nor did the revolutionaries who tore them down during the French Revolution. Somehow the one at St. Etienne du Mont survived, and it is beautiful.

DSC09229

The jubé – Rood screen, in English – at St. Etienne du Mont. For an unknown reason – unknown to us, anyway – it has a distinctly Islamic look to it. We’ve seen decorations like this in Moorish Spain.

DSC09237

For you, Margaret: said to be the most beautiful organ in Paris, and who are we to argue with that?

DSC09233

The curved nave:

DSC09245

This picture is aimed straight down the nave, past the altar. Note that the altar (with candles and a large pointy something), and the statue beyond it are actually in the center of where they stand. The church bends a few feet to the left past the jubé. Don’t know why.

I’ve got a few favorite churches in Paris, and St. Etienne du Mont joins it.

Posted in Ambles | 2 Comments

Chateau de Fontainebleau

Today Laurie and I went to Chateau de Fontainebleau again. This is at least our third visit (and maybe the fourth) and we enjoy it more each time.

The Best Audio Guide We’ve Encountered

Today we rented the audio guide and were pleased by how good it was. When these guides use technology well, they can really add to the enjoyment of a visit. The Chateau’s audio guides are smart-phones in disguise and so they can do cool things: pictures of each room as you enter it, so you know you’re in the right room, a “Location” button that when pressed shows a 3-D view of the entire Chateau with your location marked, excellent narratives, with the ability to easily access additional narratives with greater detail or on related subjects. Cost: 3€ ($3.50); I can tell you that was money well spent!

We visited the Chateau last trip; if you want to get more information look at Chateau de Fontainebleau, 2013. The first royal edifice was built here in the 12th century, and different kings and queens added, changed, tore down and rebuilt from then until the last royalty left (that was Napoleon III, nephew of the real Napoleon, “Emperor” from 1851 until he was captured by the German army in the French-Prussian war in 1870; by the time he was released, France had moved on from his emperorship and so he moved on to England).

Many people think Chateau de Fontainebleau is more interesting and historical than Versailles, as many kings and queens contributed to it, whereas Versailles was one king. It also is way less crowded! We’ve heard that almost any time of the year, Versailles is wall-to-wall people. You’ll see in the pictures of this post that, even with a bunch of school groups touring today, it was very comfortable.

DSC09127

You know it’s going to be good when you start with this view! We walked in from a back gate so we could walk through the gardens (and get free parking)

DSC09175

Chateau de Fontainbleau – front court. At the end of the walkway is the famous stairway from which Napoleon said good-bye to his Imperial Guard…the first time. He’d be back, with disastrous results for the army (Waterloo).

DSC09129

A crib for Napoleon’s son – Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles Bonaparte, aka “The King of Rome”.

DSC09130

Another crib for the kid, because you can’t have too many cribs for a kid named Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles Bonaparte King of Rome.

DSC09169

Trinity Chapel. Can you say “ornate?” This is the view from the main floor, where the court hangers-on would have sat.

DSC09131

The Trinity Chapel, where the Royal Family sat during services. This way they didn’t have to mingle with the hoi-polloi below.

DSC09161

The Diana Gallery. Though much of the official literature of the Chateau said that the Diana – to whom there are many references throughout the Chateau – meant Diana, Goddess of the Hunt, it’s much more likely that they referred to Diane DePoitiers, mistress of Henry II.

DSC09165

Napoleon’s Throne. You have to love history like this: this is the real, authentic, actual throne Napoleon used in the room he used. Pretty cool, I think.

DSC09168

The French equivalent of “George Washington slept here:” Napoleon’s bedroom, and he did indeed sleep here many nights. He loved Chateau de Fontainebleau and spent many days and nights here.

DSC09162

A beautiful, simple room: Marie Antoinette decorated it and it was her favorite room here.

That’s Chateau de Fontainebleau. We’d go again in a minute, and I’m sure we’ll be back here again. We really love this Chateau, for its beauty and its amazing history. The Chateau was lived in by Kings Louis IX, Charles VI, Henri II and Catherine de Medici, Charles IX, Henri III, Henri IV, Louis XIII, Louis XIV (The Sun King, who built Versailles), Louis XV, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, Emperor Napoleon, Charles X, Louis Philippe, and Emperor Napoleon III. Not a bad cast of characters, history-wise.

Posted in Ambles | 1 Comment

Technical Problems Part II

This morning I ran into the same technical problems as I had in early July, so if pictures – particularly in the Venice post – are gone, bear with me. I’ll get them back, but it may take a day or two.

Update Monday, 9/14. All is well, technical-wise. My Internet provider did a fine job getting emails back, and I was able to rebuild the photo directory for the blog, so all is well. Still, the ISP has some ‘splainin’ to do, and I’ve told them to get as technical as they need to – I’ll understand – but they have to figure out why I’ve had emails and photos disappear twice now and what they’re doing to ensure it doesn’t happen again. We’ll see…I’m going to get pretty ornery if they slough me off with the “it was just a glitch” line.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Venice

We have wanted to visit Venice for many years, and last week we finally were able to do that. Our reaction: highly mixed. It’s an amazingly beautiful city and we loved walking along the canals, but we also saw what tourism is doing to this ancient city, and it ain’t pretty.

Much of Venice looks as it has for years: beautiful houses on quiet canals. But the main areas of interest are a nightmare of crowds; a friend describes Venice’s Piazza St Marco as “heaving with people.” I did some digging around and learned that during the five days we were in Venice, it’s likely that some 50,000 tourists were with us in the city each day. This is a small city and those 50,000 people were in a small part of this small city. The number of daily tourists nearly out-numbers the residents (about 58,000, and declining every year). During June and July, the tourist flood daily exceeds 60,000 people (one weekend this summer, tourist ships alone added 35,000 to the inundation).

Where the Tourists Are: It’s a Mess.

Venice-crowds-1

We ran into streets so crowded the traffic just stopped – no one could move.

Venice-crowds-2

Ah, romantic Venice…

Venice-crowds-3

I estimated 15,000 – 20,000 people in Piazza San Marco alone.

How about a romantic gondola ride? In a gondola traffic jam, 80€ ($90) for 40 minutes, singing costs extra. Really.

How about a romantic gondola ride? 80€ ($90) for 40 minutes, singing costs extra. Really. And unless you’re willing to seek out a gondolier away from the tourist areas, you’re likely to be in gondola traffic jam, like this picture.

Souvenirs are available...

Souvenirs are available…

Honestly, I’m not sure why all these people are here. Venice has a spectacular collection of Renaissance art, but when we visited one of the best – the amazing paintings of Tintoretto at Scola San Rocco – we were almost alone; there were no more than a dozen people in the building besides us . So most of these folks aren’t here to see the art. The most beautiful places were away from Piazza San Marcos, and they were deserted (see below). I don’t get it, actually.

The Grand Canal

The Grand Canal is the “Main Street” of Venice, making a large ‘S’ through the city.

DSC08913

A Palladio Church on the Giudecca, across the southern end of the Grand Canal.

DSC08926

A beauty of Venice: spectacular buildings.

This is the only place on the Grand Canal with a "sidewalk;" a place to stand and look at the canal. As you can see, it's jammed with people taking advantage of the view.

This is the only place on the Grand Canal with a “sidewalk;” a place to stand and look at the canal. As you can see, it’s jammed with people taking advantage of the view.

DSC08872

Laurie enjoying the sights on the Grand Canal.

Venice Away from the Tourists: It’s Beautiful

Okay, I’ve ranted about the ugliness of tourism in Venice. It’s also true that Venice is beautiful and contains many wonderful surprises. You just have to get off the tourist path.

The restaurant in the picture below is known for its chichettas (Italian tapas, essentially); it has room for about a dozen people and standing room outside for six or eight more. The street you see in the background is a main tourist route and was always jammed. Yet fifty feet away, here sits this restaurant with nothing but local people (and us).

DSC09115

Laurie and I walked and walked and walked and learned that around any corner can be a breathtakingly beautiful scene – Renaissance pallazos, colorful homes, quiet canals. So to give Venice its due, here are some of those scenes. This part of Venice we loved.
We spent the better part of two days walking the “back streets” (though there really aren’t any streets) of Venice. We loved this aspect of the city.

DSC08984

This street (once a canal but filled in a few hundred years ago) is no more than a hundred yards from the crowd scenes.

DSC09111 DSC09022 DSC09003 DSC08999 DSC08972 DSC08900 DSC08862 DSC08851 DSC08850

No cars here, so everything is done on the water. Need an ambulance? An ambulance boat will show up.

DSC09018

DSC09107

Lumber for construction – delivered to your door via canal.

DSC08969

Like any good European city, Venice has local markets. But here, the markets float.

DSC08970

Construction supplies.

The fastest way to get around: these beautiful wooden water taxis. Also the most expensive: $16 to get in, $2.25 a minute for the ride!

The fastest way to get around: these beautiful wooden water taxis. Also the most expensive: $16 to get in, $2.25 a minute for the ride!

Regatta Storica

We just happened to be in Venice for the Regatta Storica – the Historical Regatta. As it turned out, the Venice authorities realized that September 6 was Laurie’s birthday and scheduled the Regatta that day just for her and 50,000 people turned out to celebrate with her.

The Regatta included some beautiful historic gondolas followed by gondola races. The historic gondolas – complete with gondoliers and passengers in costumes of past times – were beautiful. The gondola races…well, we watched the boats race down the Grand Canal and then twenty minutes later race back up to the finish line. Not so interesting for us, but we loved the historic boats.

DSC08894

It was a bit busy on the Grand Canal for the Regatta Storica.

DSC08910 DSC08892

Another Seattle-ite was there.

DSC08993

Paul Allen’s boat Octopus. We didn’t see Paul, so we couldn’t ask him for a ride.

Beautiful at Night, Too.

DSC09046

I love the name of this street: “Street on the Side of the School.”

DSC09043 DSC09067

Now we’ve fulfilled our desire to visit Venice. Did we enjoy it? Yes, definitely, as long as we stayed away from the main tourist areas. Will we return? I doubt it. We’ve seen what we want to see and we don’t want to fight the crowds to see the rest. Do we worry about the future of this ancient beautiful city? Definitely – we can’t see a way that it returns to a slower, less tourist-oriented existence.

 

 

 

Posted in Venice | 3 Comments

Vaux-le-Vicomte

Ever since we arrived in mid-May, Hervé Rufin has been trying to organize a Saturday night visit to the chateau of Vaux-le-Vicomte for the candle-light visit. Finally, last Saturday the stars aligned and we made it.

Vaux-le-Compte has quite a history. Before 1657 it was a small chateau and garden, owned by Nicholas Fouquet who was a member of the Parlement de Paris and an enthusastic patron and supporter of the arts. In 1657 King Louis XIV made Fouquet his Minister of Finance which, for some odd reason, immensely increased Fouquet’s wealth. He then bought three towns around the old chateau, hired the best architect (Louis le Vau) and the best landscape architect (Le Notre), the best decorator (Charles le Brun) and twenty thousand laborers. Five years later the Chateau of Vaux-le-Vicomte was complete – appearing much as it does today.

(Full disclosure: because we were there at night and I didn’t want to drag a tripod around, I took zero pictures; these are taken from the Web).

La façade sud du château de Vaux-le-Vicomte vue depuis le "rond d'eau" - Maincy (Seine-et-Marne, France).

www.MyGorgeousWedding.com-GET-MARRIED-A-LA-FRANCAISE-VAUX-LE-VICOMTE-8 epic_11
We were there for the night visit, so here’s a picture of the chateau with its 2,000 candles. It was truly a beautiful sight.

61491-vaux-le-vicomte-soiree-aux-chandellesMary took this picture of Laurie and me. Not many pictures of me in this blog, as I’m usually doing the picture-taking.

DSCF0061The night was warm and beautiful, and after a fabulous fireworks display, we decided to wait out the crowds leaving the parking lot by having a glass of champagne. So our last memory of the evening is sitting in lounge chairs at 11:30 at night, in the warm air, sipping our champagne as we looked at the candle-lit chateau. Now, is that the way to spend an evening or what?

Thanks – many, many thanks – to Hervé for getting us organized for this night. It will certainly be the most memorable evening of our stay here this year, and will draw us back again on future trips.

Oh, one last bit of history about the chateau. In 1651, not long after the chateau and gardens were completed, Fouquet held an enormous fete to show it off. It succeeded too well: Louis XIV was invited, became convinced that the money to build it had come from royal funds diverted by Fouquet in his role as Finance Minister to the chateau, and had Fouquet arrested. He then swiped the artists – le Vau, Le Notre and Le Brun – and took them to Versailles, where they created a chateau even grander than Vaux-le-Comte.

Today Versailles is wall-to-wall tourists all the time; Laurie and I have never visited it. Vaux-le-Compte may be a “mini-Versailles,” but its beauty is just overwhelming and much easier to visit andview; we’ll be back.

 

 

Posted in Ambles | 1 Comment

Samois-sur-Seine

We’ve been living in the village of Samois-sur-Seine for almost two months now (our house-sit ends next Monday and we’ll be homeless for a while…) so I think it’s time to post some pictures about Samois.

Samois-sur-Seine (“Samois on the Seine River”) has about 2,400 residents. It is definitely a quiet town: one bakery (just re-opened to the great hopes of residents, since the previous bakery was not well known for the quality of its bread), a butcher, a few stores, a few restaurants on the river and a couple in town, several affolantes (fancy houses built on the river in the 1800s and early 1900s) and a nice mix of other houses. It’s kind of a typical small village, really.

Our digs in Samois:

Samois-23

Looking down our street, rue Maximilian Lambert (whoever he was).

Samois-24

Our house-sit digs. This is a beautiful house, with an expanded and remodeled kitchen and living room.

Some other Samois houses…

Samois-15

A house on the Seine river. Nice, but what an upkeep nightmare. Of course, I guess if you can afford the house, you can afford the upkeep.

Samois-14

An affolant. I’ve written about these houses before. They were built in the late 1800s and early 1900s, for people who lived in Paris and came here by train for weekends and vacations.

Samois-12

Another house on the river.

Samois-20

Once a florist, evidently, now a residence. Regulations often prohibit changing the façades of buildings in a downtown area (to maintain the feel of the place), so old storefronts remain, even though the building is now home to someone.

Samois-21

Samois-4

Finally, a house we can afford!

Samois’ Most Famous Person

The jazz guitarist Django Reinhardt lived here the last few years of his way-too-short life (he died here in 1953, at age 43).  In the late 1920s and 1930s, Django invented a style of jazz, popularly known as “gypsy jazz” but more accurately called “manouche,” that remains crazily popular today. There are thousands of manouche jazz bands in the world still; Seattle’s Pearl Django is one of the best.

Samois-10

Django’s home in Samois.

Samois-3

Samois

Django’s grave, in the Samois cemetery. Almost always there are guitar picks on it. We paid a visit whenever we were in Samois before, and now it’s less than half a mile away.

Interestingly, the next famous person from Samois-sur-Seine is also a jazz performer. Aimée Cyrille is from here. We saw her in Seattle last year and she was amazed that we not only knew of Samois, but that we’d been there and knew people here. She is nothing short of phenomenal; if you get the opportunity to see her, do it!

Some doors and windows of Samois…

Samois-22 Samois-17 Samois-9 Samois-8 Samois-7Walking along the Seine…always a treat.

Samois-11Samois-16

That’s our current home-away-from-home. Samois is a beautiful little village; we’ve enjoyed our time here a lot.

 

Posted in Samois-sur-Seine | Leave a comment

Nantillois

I will forgive you if you haven’t heard of the French town of Nantillois; after all, its current population is 64. Fortunately for us, two of those 64 are Maarten and Didi, a Dutch couple who moved to Nantillois eight years ago and opened a wonderful Bed & Breakfast. They are a great team: Didi runs the B & B, and cooks lovely dinners for guests; Maarten has a small World War I museum, a huge amount of knowledge about that war, and gives guided battle-site tours of the area. Both of them provide a warm welcome and a memorable stay. Hmmmm, sounds like a TripAdvisor review.

14-18Nantillois

Anyway…Nantillois is about 20 miles north of Verdun, where the best-known battle of World War I took place: a ten-month affair that cost the French and Germans  about 350,000 soldiers each and accomplished exactly nothing in terms of ground gained. There’s some stuff to see in that area, but we prefer being away from the tourist areas and this practice worked well for us here.

This is likely to be a long and maybe not too interesting post, especially if you’re not a history buff. I will not be (too) offended if you skip the rest.

A Quick Review of World War I

The centenary of the start of World War I has brought some recent interest in that war, but mostly it has been overshadowed by the second World War. A quick summary:

Leading up to 1914, almost all the countries of Europe entered into treaties with other countries, treaties that locked countries into defending each other should one of the countries be attacked. This became a huge and complicated web, and its result was that when, in June 1914, the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo, Bosnia, a long line of treaties were activated and brought all the European powers into conflict, culminating in early August when Germany declared war on Russia and France, and the response was Russia, France and Britain declaring war on Germany. The madness commenced.

Germany invaded France and Belgium with some success, pushing to the Marne River in France and establishing a line from Belgium southeast across France. But France and Britain stopped the German forces there and both sides “dug in,” building an astonishingly complex series of trenches to defend their lines. Often the front lines of these trenches were just a few hundred yards apart. For three years, there were skirmishes along those lines as one side or the other attempted to gain some territory, but essentially, the front moved very little and often at a profound cost in lives.

World War I differed profoundly from earlier wars; where war had always been a matter of conquering territory, WWI was a war of attrition: kill soldiers of the other side faster than they kill your soldiers. For four years, both sides tried to outlast and out-kill the other. It wasn’t until the United States entered the war in 1918 and sent 2 million fresh troops and $billions of new, state-of-the-art equipment that the west was able to finally overwhelm and push back the Germans. Once the big Allied assault began in September of 1918, it took less than 60 days to end the war.

Okay, enough background. We wanted to see and feel this history, and indeed we did. The first glimpse was in the Argonne Forest, where the trench lines had been the scene of four years of skirmishes. The first sight of a trench – many remain – was almost startling, like seeing a ghost of the past.

WWI (5 of 25)It has, of course, worn down over the years, but it’s still there and still eerie. Soldiers would rotate between the front-line trenches and safer camps a mile or so behind them. There are, in many places, huge complexes of trenches, with multiple parallel lines. In areas such as the Argonne Forest these lines would have been under almost constant shelling from artillery.

It’s something of a misnomer to have called this the Battle of the Argonne Forest because there wasn’t much forest left from early in the war; artillery destroyed it. Today the trees are all under one hundred years old and the usually-level ground of the forest still shows the effects of the bombing:

WWI (8 of 25)

Young trees and ground mounded and cratered by artillery shelling for almost four years.

WWI (7 of 25) WWI (6 of 25)This picture was taken in 1917 in the same forest as the pictures above. Not much forest left.argonne_forestIn late September 1918 the Allies – mostly France, Britain and the United States – started the offensive that would end the war. Nantillois was in German hands and had been for several years so the whole area was well defended. Maarten took us on a three-hour walking tour of the area, describing the battles as the American troops, responsible for pushing the Germans out of the region, progressed across the country-side. The picture below is at the edge of a forest; American soldiers came from the forest at the right (Montfaucon, which required two days to take and was so completely destroyed that the town was rebuilt half a mile away), across the hills and then to the forest on the right of the bottom picture, which looks in the opposite direction. The battle plan was to take all this in a day, but the defenses were much stiffer than expected, and a week was needed to clear this area.

nantillois
WWI (12 of 25)
Here Maarten was invaluable, as he described the movement and difficulties and battles. We could stand there and envision the soldiers moving across the fields, encountering horrendous machine-gun fire from German forces dug into the top of each hill. It was cold, pouring rain, and the troops outran their supplies; some units went four days without food.

Maarten then took us through the forest. German troops had a large camp there, and were well dug-in.

WWI (13 of 25)

A German emplacement restored by Maarten.

American troops in the forest got a break when they had to wait for units alongside them to catch up. They dug foxholes and rested – as much as one can rest in a rain-filled hole. This area has hundreds of these foxholes still visible.
WWI (1 of 1)

Maarten has discovered thousands of artifacts of the war and told us that walking through a freshly plowed field will always result in such discoveries. Laurie and I did that our last morning and in fifteen minutes found half a dozen such artifacts: a horseshoe, some pieces of a horse’s tackle, part of an artillery shell and some unidentifiable scrap.

We saw much more and visited several other very interesting sites, but enough is enough. I’ll leave you with just a couple more pictures.

It was moving to visit these sites, to be able to “see” the things that happened at each of them, to feel the human element. These weren’t just battles on a chess board; there were real people, just like us, doing their best in absolutely appalling conditions: they were hungry, cold, wet, bone-tired and, more than anything, they were scared all the time. We talk of sending men to war, but we don’t; we send boys. Most of the soldiers in these armies – on both sides – were eighteen or nineteen years old; tested veterans were twenty-one or twenty-two or twenty-three. These were kids, just trying to do their best and just trying to survive. Way, way too many did not:

WWI (2 of 25)

A cemetery for French soldiers. Here are buried 5,700 French soldiers; four-tenths of one percent of French losses in World War I.

The American cemetery at Romagne. 14,267 American soldiers lie here.

The American cemetery at Romagne-sous-Montfaucon. 14,267 American soldiers lie here. The rows seem sadly endless.

WWI (26 of 1)-2

The United States lost 126,000 boys in World War I; France lost 1,375,000; Germany, 1,773,000; Russia, 1,700,000; Austria-Hungary, 1,200,000. No wonder Laurie and I have become more adamantly pacifist and non-violent as we’ve grown older. The only thing World War I accomplished was to set  the stage for World War II, at a cost of 8.3 million soldiers killed and 19 million wounded.

Posted in Rambles | 1 Comment

Road trip!

Oh, boy, a road trip! Last Sunday we took off with Mary and Gilles on a road trip to the city of Reims and a tiny town in the middle of a World War I battle site. We wanted to return to Reims because we loved the city when we were there two years ago and wanted to see it again. Also, Reims is the big city in the region that produces champagne and we can always use some more champagne. We wanted to visit some World War I sites because, well, that’s been kind of a forgotten war in the United States and as I read about World War II, I realized that I knew nothing about its predecessor.

I’ll post about Reims first because that’s where we went first and also because I’ve got to let the WW I stuff sink in a bit; it was pretty moving and powerful.

So…Reims and Champagne

Let’s start with the Cathedral. I’ve written about this before (Reims, 2013), but a few words. All the kings of France, save two, were crowned here, starting with Clovis in 496 and ending with Charles X in 1825. The cathedral was damaged badly during World War I, as was all of Reims, but has been mostly re-constructed. Our favorite part is the modern stained-glass windows installed over the last ten years. Laurie and I spent a long time looking at these, and then returned the last morning we were in Reims for another look.

This is the iconic “Smiling Angel” on the facade of the Cathedral, probably the most famous church carving anywhere. We said, “Au revoir” to her, as we certainly will return to this Cathedral.

Reims (1 of 20)

Reims Automobile Museum

Yep, we went to a great car museum in Reims. This is a private collection, and it’s mostly French cars, starting at the turn of the century. Gilles and I enjoyed it greatly, and Mary and Laurie were gracious enough to say they enjoyed it, too.

Some highlights:

Rosengart

I know that most of you – well, the car enthusiasts, anyway – are saying, “But John, did the museum have any Rosengarts?” Well, of course it did; for those who have always wanted to know more about Rosengart automobiles, here are the ones in the museum:

Amazing, eh? All those Rosengarts in one place. (Rosengart went out of business in 1953, after a long and less than illustrious history. Honestly, I’d never heard of Rosengart until I saw these.)

Champagne

The next day, to recover from the excitement of the Automobile Museum, we went to the heart of the Champagne region to buy some champagne, of course! Now, you may recall my rant from a couple years ago about the “showing off” nature of many wineries in the U.S. of A, where you can buy logo hats, logo coats, logo shirts, logo wine-openers, logo mukluks, and oh, yeah, wine. So here’s some pictures of the champagne maker we visited.

First, we had to find the place, and fortunately Mary and Gilles had been there before. Note the lack of signage:

Champagne (1 of 6)

 

The Patronne greeted us and took us into the beautiful tasting room (which also doubles as the company office).

Champagne (6 of 6)Note the beautiful decorations…

Champagne (2 of 6) Champagne (3 of 6)The Patronne, who, with her husband, has been making champagne for a loooooong time, asked us what we’d like to try. She then went out, got a bottle of it, uncorked it and proceeded to pour five (one for herself, of course) full-sized glasses of her champagne. No tiny sips here.

Champagne (4 of 6)When we’d tasted her amazingly good champagne, she poured us all another glass and left to get our order. It was a good thing we’d already decided what to buy, because after a couple glasses we might have ordered ten or twelve cases each.

A word about champagne: in the United States we think of champagne as a drink reserved for special occasions. Here in France it’s usually the same: champagne served on a special occasion, except that almost anything qualifies as a special occasion: friends over for dinner, getting together for a drink, a sunny day. It’s not at all unusual to have champagne here, a custom we really like.

Another word about champagne: there really are three types. Most champagne contains juice from chardonnay and pinot noir grapes. Then there is blanc de noirs, which is made entirely of pinot noir juice. Finally, and new to us, is blanc de blanc, which is 100% chardonnay. I’m sure wine stores in the States have blanc de blanc, but it’s not common and we’d never had it until early in our trip this year. We love it. It seems softer than the other two types; purer, maybe. Anyway, after our trip to the champagne country we have a bunch of it. Can’t wait for a special occasion. Oh, look, it’s a sunny day…

 

 

 

Posted in Rambles | 2 Comments

Henry

Everyone has something they are really good at. So far, it appears that Henry is really good at sleeping…

IMG_0671

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments